All that stress

So what are the outcomes from keeping an individual operating close to or beyond their optimal stress?

What you get is a decrease in human performance, thats is decision making capabilities are reduced, physical capabilities are reduced and the body fatigues. What this means for an outdoor professional is that it makes their life more difficult.

A fatigued person in the outdoors is going to be more susceptible to injury. I’ve had a quick scan round the literature and there is no studies that have looked at injuries for outdoor professionals and when they happen. However generally from occupational studies it shows that a number of injuries are caused from fatigue, the link between fatigue and driving accidents has been highly publicised. This should be a serious concern to outdoor professionals as they quite often drive back from remote areas after a week or longer in the field sometimes with a bus load of passengers. However it may not be as serious as a motor vehicle accident more the risk of a musculoskeletal injury from loading a canoe on a trailer or roof racks. This combined with dehydration and nutritional deficiencies from operating in the field and the body is again susceptible to injury and disease.

Impairment of decision making abilities from cumulative stress is a major consideration in outdoor work. Outdoor professionals are involved in making a decisions constantly often beyond the departure of participants. This combined with programming design that sees programs build up towards a climax increases the stress applied to the guide. If the program involves a pre dawn start on the final day, the body is already operating out of regular operating limits as dictated by its circadian rhythm. If an incident was to occur the mental capacities of a guide who has been operating for weeks on end with limited rest time would be far lower than their optimum.

Reading the work of Glyn Thomas from La Trobe Uni, this is also a cause of burnout amongst outdoor staff in Australia and would be the case for operations across the world. If your mental capabilities are already stressed returning to the non-outdoor world may not be the easiest thing with those stressors building on the ones that have just been left behind in the bush, eg relationships, company management and finances.

Some strategies are to have strategic human resources planning that recognizes the needs of peak times and employees are not overworked and get rest time between field time. By having this rest time between programs the out of field world doesn’t build up as a stressor eg not having gone to the bank to make a payment, seeing your partner, eating nutritional food. Have people there to assist in administration of the process, eg field staff should not be dealing with cleaning clients gear. The field staff are the people you are paying to keep the client alive in the outdoors, skills worth far more than than the cost incurred by having them wash a tent which almost anyone could do. Treat the guide as a person of skill, limit the amount of non-skilled labouring that they are required to do, this is just building on their fatigue. This is often an idea that outdoor companies struggle with especially if their staff earn less than what it costs for a casual cleaner. However the cost of retraining an outdoor professional that is replacing a trained person that has burnt out is far more expensive than paying that casual who comes in Friday evenings and cleans gear. At the end of the day that experience you lose is worth far more in risk management and client satisfaction especially when it comes to managing an emergency.

Therefore an understanding in management is probably the biggest factor in reducing stress buildup, by knowing the stressors and the effect that they bring and having an understanding then management can assess its employees for these effects. They can then work with it, eg take people off the roster, put employees on less intensive options, plan for the stress. If management treats these people as commodities as many organisations in the business world do then if they are lucky the employee will just leave, if they are unlucky they may kill someone.

Outdoor Research Nighthaven

Having seen this in Mountain Equipment the other week I quickly became interested. I own a Black Diamond Betamid and have used it quite extensively while working at OEG, so I wanted to see what OR had done to improve the twin trekking pole shelter.
The biggest disappointment with my Betamid is that it leaks like a sieve and gets saturated really quickly, not to mention the floor is only just dirt proof.
With the Nighthaven, OR have forsaken the idea of having a tub floor for a an overlapping design where the tent wall overlaps the floor, to I guess make a seal. I really don’t know how waterproof that could be and I wouldn’t like to set it up anywhere where running water could be an issue. However the claim is that it keeps bugs out with this design.
As for the material used in construction of the Nighthaven, it is called Silnyl, which I guess is the shortened way of saying Siliconised Nylon. This would be on its way to being more waterproof than the standard nylon Betamid. The Nighthaven also has the advantage of vents in the roof and is able to get some airflow in to reduce condensation, something you have to raise the sides on the Betamid for.
Well at $AU240 and another $AU70 for the floor it is a bit more expensive than the Betamid. Though that would be for the Siliconised Nylon exterior. By the time you consider buy the trekking poles as well you pretty much have paid for a half decent 2 person tent anyway.
If anyone one would want to let me use their Nighthaven I’d be happy to give it a test run but I don’t think I’ll be rushing out to buy one.